Skip to main content

The House Intelligence Committee Adopted Several Other Covert Action-Related Measures as Part of FY2010 Intelligence Bill

The House Intelligence Committee adopted several additional statutory changes with regard to
covert action notifications. One such change would require that the information or material
concerning covert actions include any information or material relating to the legal authority under
which a covert action is being or was conducted, and any information or material relating to legal
issues upon which guidance was sought in carrying out or planning the covert action, including
dissenting legal views.46

Another change would require that the President provide Members who are not notified of a
particular covert action, pursuant to the procedures established by the each of the committees,
with general information on the content of the covert action.47

The Committee also adopted a provision that would permit a member who objects to a particular
covert action that has been notified to submit an objection to the Director of National Intelligence.
The DNI is required to notify the President of the objection no later than 48 hours after the
objection has been submitted.48

Finally, the committee approved covert action-related provisions that would:

• require that the CIA inspector general audit each covert action every three
years;49

• require that the President maintain a record of the Members of Congress notified
of a covert action and to provide such record within 30 days after the notification
is provided;50 and

• define the current statutory phrase “significant undertaking” to mean an activity
involving the potential for loss of life; requiring an expansion of existing
authorities, including authorities relating to research, development, or operations;
resulting in the expenditure of significant funds or other resources; requiring
notification under section 504; giving rise to a significant risk of disclosing
intelligence sources or methods; or possibly causing serious damage to the
diplomatic relations if the activity were to be disclosed without authorization.51

Endnotes

46 See H.R. 2701, Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, Sec. 321 (d).

47 Ibid, (g) (2).

48 Ibid, (g) (1).

49 Ibid, Sec. 411.

50 Ibid, Sec. 321 (g) (3).

51 Ibid, Sec. 321 (d) (2).
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Darker Bioweapons Future

3 November 2003 A panel of life science experts convened for the Strategic Assessments Group by the National Academy of Sciences concluded that advances in biotechnology, coupled with the difficulty in detecting nefarious biological activity, have the potential to create a much more dangerous biological warfare (BW) threat. The panel noted: The effects of some of these engineered biological agents could be worse than any disease known to man. The genomic revolution is pushing biotechnology into an explosive growth phase. Panelists asserted that the resulting wave front of knowledge will evolve rapidly and be so broad, complex, and widely available to the public that traditional intelligence means for monitoring WMD development could prove inadequate to deal with the treat from these advanced biological weapons. Detection of related activities, particularly the development of novel bioengineered pathogens, will depend increasingly on more specific human intelligence and, argued panelist...
1 comment
Read more

MKULTRA Proposal - Subproject 133

Proposal entitled [redacted] Submitted on behalf of [redacted] June 1962 DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY June 14, 1962 Purpose of Study: The purpose of this proposal is a request for financial support to continue an investigation of microbial action on marine manganese nodules and terrigenous mineral sulfides, which the principal investigator has been pursuing since 1958. Very intensive work on these materials is being carried on by him, with fruitful results, during the current year, 1961-62, under a grant from the [...] of Stanford University, California. Since relatively little is known about microbial mineral transformation, and in view of current academic and practical interest of microbiologists, geologists, mining engineers, soil scientists, oceanographers, etc., in the subject, this research should make a valuable contribution to science. Summary of Past Work: a. Bacteriology of mineral sulfides. Attempts were made to evaluate the microbial flora isolable from unsterilized, crushed sulfi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Watergate Principals - Direct or Indirect Involvement

23 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management and Services 1. This memorandum responds to the Director's request for a report of any involvement in any capacity since 1 January 1969 with Messrs. Hunt, McCord, Liddy, Young, or Krogh. 2. I have had none with Hunt, Liddy or Young. 3. My McCord contact with indirect and occurred sometime during the late 1960s when I was Director, Office of Computer Services. I opposed plans for Technical Division, Office of Security (under Mr. McCord) to acquire a separate computer for its In-Place Monitoring System. [...] of DD/S&T (then ORD) was the computer individual working with TD and, I think, would have details. 4. The Krogh contact also was indirect and involved his request, first through OMB, that CIA fund foreign travel on behalf of the Cabinet Committee on International Narcotics Control. Individual phone discussions are noted in the attached. The Agency focal points were [...] and [...]. I understand [...] has forwarded re...
Post a Comment
Read more