Skip to main content

What Are Special Operations and Paramilitary Operations?

The U.S. strategy in pursuing the war on international terrorism involves a variety of
missions conducted by military and civilian intelligence personnel characterized as
“special operations” or paramilitary operations. The separate roles of the Department of
Defense (DOD) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) are not always clearly reflected in
media accounts and at times there has been considerable operational overlap. Proposals such as
those made by the 9/11 Commission to change organizational relationships will, however, be
evaluated on the basis of separate roles and missions, operating practices, and relevant statutory
authorities.

DOD defines special operations as “operations conducted in hostile, denied, or politically
sensitive environments to achieve military, diplomatic, informational, and/or economic objectives
employing military capabilities for which there is no broad conventional force requirement.”1

DOD defines paramilitary forces as “forces or groups distinct from the regular armed forces of
any country, but resembling them in organization, equipment, training or mission.” In this report,
the term “paramilitary operations” will be used for operations conducted by the CIA whose
officers and employees are not part of the armed forces of the United States. (In practice, military
personnel may be temporarily assigned to the CIA and CIA personnel may temporarily serve
directly under a military commander.)

In general, special operations are distinguishable from regular military operations by degree of
physical and political risk, operational techniques, and mode of employment among other factors.
DOD special operations are frequently clandestine—designed in such a way as to ensure
concealment; they are not necessarily covert, that is, concealing the identity of the sponsor is not
a priority. The CIA, however, conducts covert and clandestine operations to avoid directly
implicating the U.S. Government.

Endnotes

1 Definitions are from Joint Publication 1-02, “Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms,” Apr. 12, 2001, as amended through Oct. 7, 2004.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Project TWO-FOLD

25 MAY 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR: Executive Secretary, CIA Management Committee 1. This memorandum sets forth a recommendation for your approval in paragraph 5. 2. For the past several years, this office has been supporting the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs (BNDD) by spotting, assessing, and recruiting personnel to form an internal security unit whose primary mission is the detection of corruption within the BNDD. Subsequent to the recruitment and training stage, the individuals selected are turned over to the Chief Inspector of BNDD for operational guidance and handling in their various domestic assignments. 3. Recently, this Agency has extended this activity by supporting BNDD in the covert acquisition of individuals who are hired as Staff Agents utilized under nonofficial cover and directed against the principal international drug traffickers. These individuals are true employees of the BNDD and, although all administrative details relative to their employment are handled within...

Victory Through Auto Registration

Joel Ross Anti-imperialism in Panama "The Panamanian people, with their patriotic government as the vanguard, have been valiantly struggling against US imperialist economic and political aggression and hegemony." This statement typifies the rancid rhetoric that Panamanians hear from the men who wield or symbolize the power in their country, primarily General Manuel Noriega, chief of the Panama Defense Forces (PDF), and Manuel Solis Palma, the head of government. I say "head of government," because, while the Panamanian Government refers to "President" Solis Palma, the US Government recognizes him as "Minister in Charge of the Presidency." A Devious Plan The Panamanian Government has stressed the importance of defeating "US imperialism" and its Panamanian "agents." It says these "bad Panamanians" are from the upper class and have "Caucasian tendencies." That is the government's way of implying to the maj...

The Darker Bioweapons Future

3 November 2003 A panel of life science experts convened for the Strategic Assessments Group by the National Academy of Sciences concluded that advances in biotechnology, coupled with the difficulty in detecting nefarious biological activity, have the potential to create a much more dangerous biological warfare (BW) threat. The panel noted: The effects of some of these engineered biological agents could be worse than any disease known to man. The genomic revolution is pushing biotechnology into an explosive growth phase. Panelists asserted that the resulting wave front of knowledge will evolve rapidly and be so broad, complex, and widely available to the public that traditional intelligence means for monitoring WMD development could prove inadequate to deal with the treat from these advanced biological weapons. Detection of related activities, particularly the development of novel bioengineered pathogens, will depend increasingly on more specific human intelligence and, argued panelist...