Skip to main content

Silent Killing - Section 8

Various holds, blows, attacks, etc.

These will be known, of course, to all instructors and should be learned by all students who wish to qualify as instructors. In general, they are quite unnecessary and most of them can be regarded as peace-time measures. Students should be warned that many of these holds, etc., would be difficult, if not impossible, to secure on a trained adversary and that it is extremely unwise to assume too lightly that one's adversary is untrained. In showing a hold, show also how to get out of it.

(Handcuff hold
( " " for smaller opponent.
(Wrist and neck attack.
(Police holds.
(Flying mare (with variation)
(Hipe (or hip throw)
(Cross-buttock.

Comment. All the above are open to the objection that while attempting to apply them, you make yourself very vulnerable to attack. Also, if you are in a position to apply them, you are equally in a position for a killing attack.

THUMB-HOLD. Show how escape can often be effected.

HEAD-HOLD. This gives your opponent an opportunity for a crotch throw that can finish you.

Arm and neck hold. Effective when got but very difficult to get with a quick opponent.

Japanese Strangle. When the hand is in the correct position, i.e., almost on top of the hand, it is impossible to prevent the hand from being dragged away. If the hand is too low down, where it cannot be seized, then there is no leverage and the hold becomes ineffective. The hold can only be relied on if secured and taken to its conclusion with extreme speed.

(Wrist throw.
(Japanese ankle throw.


Comment. Good, but why not use one or other of the effective blows?

Rock-crusher. Good, but not always certain in its effects.

Grape-vine. Useless as a means of keeping a man prisoner. It takes two men to apply it and if he does not escape from it, he will die before very long. If you wish to kill him do so, but do not torture him. If you wish to keep him prisoner, tie him up.

Match-box blow. Excellent, if you happen to have a match-box in your hand at the critical moment. Why not use a side-of-the-hand blow?

Baton and Spring cosh. Show their use and possible counters.

Bayonet parries. Show them but with the caution that they are all very risky against a good bayonet fighter, who might also have a round in the breech.

Safety-razor blade or blades in peak of cap. Show it so that students may know what to expect, but do not recommend it.

NOTE. Holds designed to keep a man captive or to take him away as a prisoner.

When showing these, it is as well to explain that the man who attempts to use them for any purpose other than as a means of finishing off an opponent should realize that he is taking a considerable risk, a risk only justified after crippling his opponent or if possessing an obvious superiority in physique or knowledge.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Darker Bioweapons Future

3 November 2003 A panel of life science experts convened for the Strategic Assessments Group by the National Academy of Sciences concluded that advances in biotechnology, coupled with the difficulty in detecting nefarious biological activity, have the potential to create a much more dangerous biological warfare (BW) threat. The panel noted: The effects of some of these engineered biological agents could be worse than any disease known to man. The genomic revolution is pushing biotechnology into an explosive growth phase. Panelists asserted that the resulting wave front of knowledge will evolve rapidly and be so broad, complex, and widely available to the public that traditional intelligence means for monitoring WMD development could prove inadequate to deal with the treat from these advanced biological weapons. Detection of related activities, particularly the development of novel bioengineered pathogens, will depend increasingly on more specific human intelligence and, argued panelist...

MKULTRA Proposal - Subproject 133

Proposal entitled [redacted] Submitted on behalf of [redacted] June 1962 DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY June 14, 1962 Purpose of Study: The purpose of this proposal is a request for financial support to continue an investigation of microbial action on marine manganese nodules and terrigenous mineral sulfides, which the principal investigator has been pursuing since 1958. Very intensive work on these materials is being carried on by him, with fruitful results, during the current year, 1961-62, under a grant from the [...] of Stanford University, California. Since relatively little is known about microbial mineral transformation, and in view of current academic and practical interest of microbiologists, geologists, mining engineers, soil scientists, oceanographers, etc., in the subject, this research should make a valuable contribution to science. Summary of Past Work: a. Bacteriology of mineral sulfides. Attempts were made to evaluate the microbial flora isolable from unsterilized, crushed sulfi...

Watergate Principals - Direct or Indirect Involvement

23 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director for Management and Services 1. This memorandum responds to the Director's request for a report of any involvement in any capacity since 1 January 1969 with Messrs. Hunt, McCord, Liddy, Young, or Krogh. 2. I have had none with Hunt, Liddy or Young. 3. My McCord contact with indirect and occurred sometime during the late 1960s when I was Director, Office of Computer Services. I opposed plans for Technical Division, Office of Security (under Mr. McCord) to acquire a separate computer for its In-Place Monitoring System. [...] of DD/S&T (then ORD) was the computer individual working with TD and, I think, would have details. 4. The Krogh contact also was indirect and involved his request, first through OMB, that CIA fund foreign travel on behalf of the Cabinet Committee on International Narcotics Control. Individual phone discussions are noted in the attached. The Agency focal points were [...] and [...]. I understand [...] has forwarded re...